North Texas Research Forum 2025

Files

Download

Download Full Text (268 KB)

Division

North Texas

Hospital

Medical City Denton

Specialty

Orthopedic Surgery

Document Type

Poster

Publication Date

2025

Keywords

orthopedic surgery, osteopathic medicine, internship and residency, graduate medical education

Disciplines

Medicine and Health Sciences | Orthopedics | Osteopathic Medicine and Osteopathy | Surgery

Abstract

Background Orthopedic surgery remains one of the most competitive specialties. Osteopathic candidates have recently matched at lower rates than allopathic students. One disparity that may exist is research, which has become a critical component of candidate applications. This study aimed to examine the representation of osteopathic-affiliated first authors, senior authors, and overall osteopathic-affiliated authors, in the top 25 leading U.S. orthopedic journals published between 2000 and 2024. Methods A retrospective bibliometric review was conducted on articles published from 2000 to 2024 in orthopedic journals. Journals were selected based on their h-index score. Institutional affiliations were used to identify osteopathic authors. Articles with a majority of authors from foreign institutions were excluded. T-tests and chi-squared tests were used to assess continuous and categorical variables. Multivariate regression identified factors influencing osteopathic authorship. Results 958 articles included osteopathic authors. 570 out of 958 articles with osteopathic authors were published after the AOA-ACGME merger. Senior osteopathic authorship significantly increased the osteopathic author makeup of articles, with the average number of osteopathic authors per article increasing from 0.02 to 2.93 (p<0.001). After the merger, articles with at least one osteopathic author increased from 1.5% of all articles to 3.3% of all articles (p<0.001). When looking at only osteopathic articles before and after the merger, there was a significant increase from 1.82 to 2.22 osteopathic authors per article (p<0.001). Senior osteopathic authorship was also found to significantly increase the odds of having a first osteopathic author (OR: 213.34; 95% CI [165.65, 275.64]; p<0.001). The merger has significantly increased the odds of having at least one osteopathic author in an article (OR: 2.02; 95% CI [1.76, 2.31]; p<0.001). Conclusions Osteopathic physicians, students, and institutions remain underrepresented in orthopedic literature. However, the presence of senior osteopathic authors and the AOA-ACGME merger have positively influenced osteopathic authorship. These findings suggest that reducing the divide between osteopathic and allopathic education, along with enhancing osteopathic mentorship, may help address academic disparities in orthopedics.

Original Publisher

HCA Healthcare Graduate Medical Education

Osteopathic Representation in Orthopedic Literature: A 25-Year Analysis of Publication Trends of Former AOA Residency Programs and Osteopathic Medical Schools

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.