Title

Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) and Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) Synergistically Decrease Pre-Term Delivery in Patients Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

Division

West Florida

Hospital

Brandon

Document Type

Poster

Publication Date

10-12-2019

Keywords

fertilization in vitro, genetic testing, frozen embryo transfer, assisted reproduction techniques

Disciplines

Investigative Techniques | Obstetrics and Gynecology | Therapeutics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of FET and FET post PGT (FET/PGT) on pre-term and very pre-term deliveries in patients undergoing IVF with elective single embryo transfer (eSET).

DESIGN: Retrospective cohort Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) data study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the publicly available data in the SART National Summary Report from 2014 to 2017. Cycle inclusion criteria were eSET, fresh embryo transfers (ET), and frozen embryo transfers (FET) with or without PGT (FET/PGT). Exclusion criteria were use of gestational carriers and donor eggs. Pregnancy outcomes included live births and gestational age at delivery (term: ≥37 weeks, pre-term: ≥32 to <37 weeks, and very pre-term: <32 weeks). Chi-squared test was used to compare variables between groups. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS: A total of 161,550 eSETs were analyzed for the effect of FET and PGT on IVF outcome and pre-term deliveries including 43,618 ETs, 58,812 FETs and 59,120 frozen embryo transfers post PGT (FET/PGT). Live birth rates in patients with FET/PGT were significantly higher than those in ET (52.9% vs 46.4%, P < 0.0001) and FET (52.9% vs 43.1%, P < 0.0001). Patients with FET had significantly lower live birth rate compared with that of ET (43.1% vs 46.4%, P < 0.0001). Both FET and FET/PGT significantly increased term deliveries compared with ET (89.1% and 89.5% vs 88.6%, P < 0.05 and < 0.001). There were no statistical differences among ET, FET and FET/PGT in terms of pre-term delivery, however, FET/PGT significantly reduced very pre-term deliveries when compared with ET and FET (1.5% vs 2.0%, P < 0.0001 and 1.5% vs 1.9%, P = 0.0002).

Conclusion: PGT has been integrated into one of the most important roles in IVF treatment. This study using large cohort SART data demonstrates that PGT significantly improves IVF outcome. Moreover, this study shows that patients undergoing PGT accompanied with subsequent FET had significantly increased term deliveries. More important, patients with FET/PGT had significantly lower very preterm deliveries compared with patients with ET and FET. Higher term deliveries and Lower incidence of very pre-term delivery associated with PGT should be taken into account when counseling patients seeking infertility treatment.

Publisher or Conference

American Society for Reproductive Medicine Scientific Congress and Expo

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS