•  
  •  

Scholarly Commons > HCA Healthcare Journal > Vol. 4 > Iss. 4 (2023)

 

Keywords

quality improvement; emergency medical technicians; emergency medical services; EMS, paramedics; Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation; RSI; video recordings; documentation; emergency medicine

Disciplines

Emergency Medicine | Quality Improvement

Abstract

Introduction

Quality improvement (QI) is a major focus of all departments and fields of health care, including emergency medical services. The chaotic and rapidly evolving atmosphere in which paramedics must practice can lead to inconsistency between what is documented and the actual events. This leads to difficulty when trying to evaluate the practitioners and when implementing a QI program. In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of discrepancy between the video and written record for Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) performed in the field as a demonstration of the utility of video documentation in QI.

Methods

We used a systematic retrospective chart review to compare written with video documentation in 100 consecutive prehospital RSI encounters in a single EMS agency.

Results

Of the patient care records (PCRs), only 6% matched the video record for all quality measures tracked. The largest reason for the discrepancy was in the time required to intubate (58%) whether LEMON was evaluated (42%), total number of intubation attempts (36%), first attempt success (24%), BVM used (18%), and whether an airway introducer device was used (12%).

Conclusion

Written documentation is inaccurate compared to video documentation when used as a quality improvement process for EMS prehospital RSI encounters.

Download

Share

COinS