Keywords
graduate medical education; internship and residency; American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination; ABSITE; general surgery; educational measurement; graduate records examination
Disciplines
Medical Education | Surgery
Abstract
Background
We endeavored to create an evidence-based curriculum to improve general surgery resident fund of knowledge. Global and resident-specific interventions were employed to this end. These interventions were monitored via multiple choice question results on a weekly basis and American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) performance.
Methods
This study was performed in a prospective manner over a 2-year period. A structured textbook review with testing was implemented for all residents. A focused textbook question-writing assignment and a Surgical Council on Resident Education (SCORE)-based individualized learning plan (ILP) were implemented for residents scoring below the 35th percentile on the ABSITE.
Results
Curriculum implementation resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the number of residents scoring below the 35th percentile, from 50% to 30.8% (P = .023). One hundred percent of residents initially scoring below the 35th percentile were successfully remediated over the study period. Average overall program ABSITE percentile scores increased from 38.5% to 51.4% over a 2-year period.
Conclusion
Structured textbook review and testing combined with a question-writing assignment and a SCORE-focused ILP successfully remediated residents scoring below the 35th percentile and improved general surgery residency ABSITE performance.
Recommended Citation
Pinnola, Aaron and Kaufmann, Christoph
(2024)
"Structured Textbook Review and Individualized Learning Plans Successfully Remediate Underperforming Residents and Improve General Surgery Program Performance on the ABSITE,"
HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine: Vol. 5:
Iss.
1, Article 9.
DOI: 10.36518/2689-0216.1616
Available at:
https://scholarlycommons.hcahealthcare.com/hcahealthcarejournal/vol5/iss1/9